I was reading an article in the most recent edition of NJ Municipalities. It was on the subject of Municipal Capital Projects. It started with the following quote from John F. Kennedy,
“Change is the law of
life. And those who look only to the
past or the present are certain to miss the future.”
I had not heard it before, but it did resonate with me. I love a good quote! As Municipal Manager, I have encountered many
people who subconsciously fear change and consciously oppose issues that move
our town forward, whether it involves development, redevelopment, capital
improvements, municipal services, or restructuring a fire department to answer
the community's public safety needs. No
matter the issue or the actions the elected officials or I take that are
intended to impact the community positively; there will undoubtedly be opposition
and disagreement in some form or another.
In my first few years, I had the naïve thought that there was no way
someone could be against “this or that,” but it never took too long to understand
how wrong I was. As I approach my
seventh year in the position, though I strive for universal approval, I
understand it is impossible.
Several
months ago, at a council meeting where a redevelopment project was being
discussed, an elderly man approached the podium to participate in public
comment. I know this man to be a good
man with a good heart and a strong interest in our community and its governance. He said that “we don’t need any more apartments” in our community in an effort to
oppose a potential housing project. It
followed up on a similar position espoused by a former elected official from
our town. I found the comment to be
disappointing and shortsighted. The idea of “closing borders” is in the
national conversation, and at times, it also becomes a local battle cry. But for the local issue, I think some aspects
need to be considered that are not.
I am certain this man has lived in
this community for decades in a house he owns that probably does not have a
mortgage. So, when he says the town
doesn’t need any more apartments, he is coming from the mindset that he does
not have a need for an alternative housing situation in our town. But many people do. I can’t tell you how often I have heard that
younger people who grew up in Lawrence Township and want to stay and live here in
their young adulthood can’t afford to.
Or for the elderly person (or couple) looking to downsize, sell their
home, and can’t find an affordable rental situation in town. Or Lawrence Township’s never-ending obligation
to provide and meet affordable housing requirements (by creating new housing) as
determined by the NJ Supreme Court. We
call it an obligation, but it is better stated to be our responsibility that we
should want to meet – and we do! Like it
or not, we need to remain a thriving community, and housing is interwoven with what
a thriving community means. This is not
to say that there should be a frenzy of new housing built in our town, but
responsible growth is necessary. And
for those who will argue that our schools are overcrowded as a way to fight new
housing developments, I will tell you that the data shows this is not true.
Opposition
to change is also present in our efforts to transition from a volunteer firefighting
force to a combined volunteer-career fire department. You see it on the various community FB pages
and in letters directed to our elected officials. Though the struggle to find and have
volunteer firefighters join a fire company and respond to calls is a national
problem being addressed by thousands of communities just like ours, there is a
small group of volunteers who have a difficult time adjusting from their autonomous
status of self-rule as a fire company serving our community to one providing
fire protection within a combined fire department under the supervision and
command of a township official. We all knew
that this period of transition was going to be challenging – because change is difficult. But our elected officials and I are
responsible for ensuring public safety.
If we put community first above the wants and needs of a volunteer firefighter
and individual volunteer fire company, the path forward is clear – though the
road will be bumpy.
Since 2017, we have made substantial
efforts to support the volunteer fire companies, honor their service, and
responsibly address the serious needs of our community for firefighting
services. Will we ever get to the point where
every individual volunteer firefighter will accept the change or agree with the
decisions made in the interests of the entire community? No – most assuredly,
no. But that’s not the goal – and it can’t
be the goal. Whether it relates to capital
improvement projects, residential and commercial development projects, or addressing
serious public safety issues, change is the law of life, and we can’t miss our
future.
We want Lawrence Township to thrive,
to take action that allows us to continue to provide the services our residents
deserve and expect, and to make our community diverse and dynamic.
10 comments:
These cookie cutter apartments going up all over are over $2,000 a month, so "affordable" apartments is a myth.
These cookie cutter apartments going up everywhere are over $2,000, so the claim of apartment "affordability" is a myth.
Thank you for sharing with us your thoughts about our community. Like you said not everyone will agree with you regarding decisions you and the council make. To believe the apartments to be built on Texas Avenue will be affordable is naive. Those apartments will go for over $2000/month. You think this is affordable housing? Why couldn’t restrictions for monthly rents be included in the approval for the proposed units? Neither seniors nor young people are making over $100,000/year to justify moving into the Texas Avenue units.
Kevin, I appreciate this perspective: “We call it an obligation, but it is better stated to be our responsibility that we should want to meet – and we do!” I agree!
Thank you for your comments, everyone. The complex on Texas Avenue was approved by the Lawrence Township Zoning Board as a 100% Affordable Housing complex. It will comply with the laws established by the State of New Jersey for affordable housing, and the Township will do its part to ensure that the owner meets those obligations. Here is a link to the 2023 NJ Affordable Housing Income Limits guidelines should you be interested in becoming more knowledgeable or interested in living there if and when the complex is built: https://ahpnj.org/member_docs/Income_Limits_2023.pdf
As someone who desperately wants to move back to Lawrence but can't afford it, please keep fighting for affordable housing. I work in town, make good money on paper, but the cost of housing means I can't live in the town I love.
Lawrence Township has consistently been a leader in providing affordable housing - always ahead of the curve as compared to other municipalities. Though some have a negative view of affordable housing in their community, I believe it is almost always based on misinformation and a lack of empathy for others.
Thank you for your efforts to communicate with residents. I was hoping to hear more about what you mean when you say "growth is necessary." As a longtime resident, I've seen the town grow, and it hasn't all been positive, in my opinion. Traffic, for example, is a problem in my day-to-day life that has overall degraded my experience living here, and despite that, I seem to always see more and more construction for new residents (and their cars) and more traffic lights. From your perspective, where are we ultimately going with this vision of necessary growth? I'm not against change and I'm not necessarily against growth on principle, but responsible or not, it seems to me growth should have limits if we want to preserve a certain character for the town. Thank you for taking the time to read this comment.
Anonymous:
Thank you for your comment. What I mean by "growth is necessary" is based on a means of keeping a community healthy and thriving and being able to maintain and preserve all of the services a municipal government provides to its residents and businesses. I agree that all growth isn't positive, but smart growth is. There are some in our community who believe that there should be no new developments or housing built. This kind of thinking has two fatal flaws: 1) We have a legal obligation to meet the housing requirements determined by the Supreme Court of NJ for affordable housing. It is a continual obligation and it is also, in my opinion, a moral and just obligation - which we as a community have been at the forefront of doing. So, to say or want to have no housing developed in our town is impossible. All housing develops include a mandatory set aside for affordable units. 2) If we as a community seek to stop all development and redevelopment (and if you read some of my other blog articles on land use issues, which show that a firm "no" to landowners and developers doesn't win the day in most cases), how will we pay for all the services the municipal government provides to the community as their costs increase annually? Certainly, the answer can't and shouldn't be just to keep increasing taxes. First, all municipal governments have a cap on the amount of taxes they can compel taxpayers to pay, and Second, the cost of everything increases annually (just like the cost of living you feel in your daily life - gas, food, goods, services, etc.) have the same negative impacts on a municipal government. If we don't as a community try to stay healthy by finding ways to maintain and increase tax ratables (like doing redevelopment projects on failing commercial properties that pay less and less in taxes each year), you as resident taxpayers will absolutely feel it in the decrease in services in terms of both being able to do, let's say, the brush and leave pick up program, upkeep on roadways, garbage collection, health services, recreation, adequate first responder staffing, etc. It is a math equation that doesn't work in our favor of residents (and I am a resident, too).
And, let's be real, we live in NJ. The population will never become less dense. If you live in NJ long enough, you will feel more cars and activity on the roads...everywhere... realistically, the government can't reduce the population (legally...), so we play in the field we are provided with,and we do the best we can. Expecting everything to stay the same (some may say stagnate) is unrealistic. These are just my opinions and are not those of the elected officials. I APOLOGIZE FOR THE GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AS I WAS WRITING STREAM OF CONSCIOUS AND CONVERSATIONALLY.
As someone who loves living here, I have to say that I'm a little alarmed by this perspective. If what you say is true, that we need new growth simply to sustain the services provided by the township, then we are on an unsustainable path if we want to maintain the current character of our town. (And I'm not talking about affordable housing...the law is the law and I'm not against it.) Requiring growth to maintain the status quo would seem to create a loop of more residents and more services without end until we are....what? A small city? Is this what residents really want for the future of our town? I'm grateful that you took the time to answer my genuine concerns. I appreciate it and everything else you do for Lawrence. I recognize that you are much more well-informed than I am on these matters and mean no disrespect by disagreeing with your perspective!
Post a Comment